Thursday, October 31, 2019

Does God Still Speak Directly to People Today?



CSB17 Acts 8:29 The Spirit told Philip, "Go and join that chariot."

God spoke to Philip. The Holy Spirit gave Philip specific directions that were more specific and detailed than what Philip could have known by reading the parts of the Bible that Philip had available. First, the Spirit told Philip to “"Get up and go south to the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza"  (Acts 8:26 CSB17). Then the same Spirit told Philip to go up to a chariot he saw. Philip obeyed this guidance from the Holy Spirit and the result was that a man heard the good news about Jesus, believed it, was saved, and was baptized.

We know that God speaks to all people who are willing to listen through His Word, the Bible. But does God still also speak to people personally and directly with words of encouragement, insight, or direction which are more direct? In other words, does God still, at least sometimes, speak to people today the way that He spoke to Philip in the book of Acts? In this blog post, I will call this way of God speaking to people direct revelation. I believe that God does still speak to people by His Spirit today and does sometimes provide direct revelation. In this post, I will:

1.  share some ways in which the Bible leads us to expect direct revelation to continue today,
2.  respond to some common objections Christians raise to continued direct revelation today,
3.  offer some pastoral advice and (hopefully, prayerfully) helpful thoughts about seeking, receiving, evaluating, and following direct revelation and,
4.  share some examples of direct revelation.


Four Ways that the Bible Leads Us to Expect Direct Revelation Today

1. There are examples of God speaking to all kinds of people throughout the Bible.

God spoke directly to Adam and Eve (Genesis 1:28-30), He asks Cain why he is angry (Genesis 4:6-7), and He directs Hagar to return to her mistress (Genesis 16:8-10). God tells Jacob not to be afraid to move to Egypt (Genesis 46:2-4). God tells Aaron to meet Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 4:27). On one occasion God tells Moses to strike a rock to produce water (Exodus 17:5-6), and on a different occasion He tells Moses to speak to a rock (Numbers 20:8). God told Balaam not to curse Israel (Numbers 22:12). The Lord gave Joshua detailed instruction for how to conquer Jericho (Joshua 6:2-5). The Lord tells first Manoah’s wife, then Manoah, about the son she would give birth to (Judges 13). God gave Elijah directions and encouragement through a soft whisper (1 Kings 19:12-18). Two times God told Jonah to go to Nineveh (Jonah 1:2; 3:2).

This pattern continues in the New Testament. Zacharias is told by an angel that his wife, Elizabeth, will have a son (Luke 1:13). God tells Joseph to flee to Egypt (Matthew 2:13), later tells him to return (Matthew 2:19-20), and then tells him not to stay in Judea (Matthew 2:22). The Lord told Ananias to go and pray for a man named Saul (Acts 9:10 ff). God speaks to this same Saul (now called Paul) multiple times: telling him to leave Jerusalem (Acts 22:18), guiding him to go to Macedonia (Acts 16:9-10), encouraging Paul to keep speaking (Acts 18:9-10), warning him of bonds and afflictions (Acts 20:23), and promising him that he and those with him on a ship in a storm would survive (Acts 27:23-24).

More examples could be given from both the Old and New Testament, and indeed I have saved some relevant examples for discussion below.

The whole Bible is given to teach us. Why include many examples of God giving specific directions and personal encouragement to people throughout the Bible if God was going to stop doing this? When we read examples like this it is normal for them to stir in us an expectation that God will sometimes speak directly to us and to others today. Nothing in the Bible even comes close to being an explicit statement that God would stop speaking to us personally and directly at some point (we’ll examine the one verse I know of that people occasionally claim means this below, but you’ll see it doesn’t). Far from giving us reasons to think God might stop, the Bible gives us reasons to expect Him to continue.

#2 We are commanded to seek to prophesy.

CSB17 1 Corinthians 14:1 Pursue love and desire spiritual gifts, and especially that you may prophesy.

CSB17 1 Corinthians 14:39 So then, my brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in other tongues.

ESV 1 Thessalonians 5:19-21 Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good.

All prophecy includes what we are calling direct revelation, but not all direct revelation is prophecy. Direct revelation involves God speaking directly to a person. Prophecy also involves God speaking directly to a person, but with prophecy there is the added element that God gives a message to one person which He wants that person to share with someone else (or in some cases, to share with many people). If you examine prophecy throughout the Bible, I think you will see that the definition I have given here very consistently fits the biblical example.

Paul wrote 1 Corinthians not only to the church at Corinth, but also to “all those in every place who call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord” (1 Cor. 1:2 CSB17). In 1 Corinthians, Paul tells us to seek to prophesy. Paul includes prophecy as one of the spiritual gifts which Christians in Rome might have (Romans 12:6). Paul explains to the Corinthians that sometimes when people prophesy in church and a visitor is present, “The secrets of his heart will be revealed, and as a result he will fall facedown and worship God, proclaiming, ‘God is really among you’" (1 Cor. 14:25 CSB17). Agabus was a prophet and God spoke through him to warn that Paul would be arrested when he went to Jerusalem (Acts 21:10-11).

Why would God give us direction to seek to prophesy, command us not to despise prophetic utterances, and provide examples of Christians in the New Testament who prophesied, if He was going to stop all prophesying? While I don’t think that prophecy is as common as private words of direct revelation intended only for the person who receives them, the Bible does lead us to expect at least some words of prophecy to be given. This requires direct revelation to continue.

3. Peter declared that we are living in a time of widespread direct revelation!

CSB Acts 2:16 On the contrary, this is what was spoken through the prophet Joel:
 17 And it will be in the last days, says God, that I will pour out my Spirit on all people; then your sons and your daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, and your old men will dream dreams.
 18 I will even pour out my Spirit on my servants in those days, both men and women and they will prophesy.

On the day of Pentecost, Peter declared that Joel’s prophecy about the last days was being fulfilled. Joel prophesied that there would be a widespread work of the Holy Spirit resulting in prophesy, dreams, and visions. In this context, dreams and visions are referring to dreams and visions from God, and so these are also forms of direct revelation.

Joel said that this widespread work of the Holy Spirit would occur in “the last days.” It appears that the “last days” started on Pentecost. Since we come after that, and since Jesus has not yet returned, we must still be living in this “last days” timeframe. In fact, John tells us that we are living in “the last hour” (1 John 2:18).

Based on Peter’s interpretation of Joel, we should expect more direct revelation (in the form of prophesies, dreams, and visions) during these final days, not less. Below I’ll share evidence that God is, in fact, giving many people supernatural dreams today.

4. Our intimate relationship with our Heavenly Father makes it seem likely that He would continue to speak to us directly and intimately as He did throughout the lives of people in the Bible.

CSB17 Galatians 4:6 And because you are sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, "Abba, Father!"

Although this fourth reason for expecting direct revelation to continue today may not be as direct, I have always felt it is important. When we are born again and become part of God’s family, the Bible does not picture our relationship with God as distant. He is our Heavenly Father. Jesus said, "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him” (John 14:23 CSB17). Paul writes, “For we are the temple of the living God, as God said: I will dwell and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people” (2 Cor. 6:16 CSB17). We know that the Holy Spirit lives in us once we are saved. This certainly sounds like the type of relationship where it would not be surprising to have God speak into our thoughts.

Objections to continued direct revelation

About 24 years ago, while attending Bible seminary, I had a professor who was strongly opposed to the idea that God might speak directly to anyone today except through the words of the Bible. Overall, he was a good professor who taught God’s truth. But on this issue, I disagreed strongly with him and wrote a paper to share why I believe God still speaks to people today (this blog post draws heavily from that paper, which I still have). I probably spent more time researching for this paper than on any other topic I studied during seminary. I studied both sides of the issues. In a recent discussion on Facebook, I saw some of the same objections raised that I heard 24 years ago. These objections come from sincere, Bible believing Christians and thus deserve consideration. As you will see, I find these objections to be quite weak once they are carefully examined.

Objection #1: Paul taught that prophecy would cease when the Bible was complete

This objection, which is rarely raised (perhaps because it is so easily shown to be based on a poor interpretation of Scripture) is nevertheless worth mentioning because it is the objection which is most directly based on a passage of Scripture. Paul wrote:

CSB17 1 Cor 13:8 Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come to an end.
 9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part,
 10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will come to an end.
 11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put aside childish things.
 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I will know fully, as I am fully known.

Paul says that prophecies “will come to an end.” When will this happen? Paul tells us it will happen,  “. . . when the perfect comes.” Some have interpreted “when the perfect comes” as referring to something like when the last book of the New Testament was finished, or when the last of the Apostles died, or perhaps when the process of the church collecting and recognizing the inspired books of the New Testament was complete. They reason that once we have the whole Bible, we no longer need any more prophecy. Sometimes this reasoning is extended to say we no longer need any form of direct revelation.

It seems very unlikely that Paul was referring to the completion of the Bible when he wrote “when the perfect comes.” Paul is more likely referring to the same time he mentions in vs. 12 when he writes, “For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I will know fully, as I am fully known.” When will we see God face to face? Not when the Bible is finished, but when this current dark age comes to an end and Jesus returns and we who are in Christ are resurrected to eternal life. Likewise, Paul did not come to know God fully, compared to his partial knowledge when writing 1 Corinthians, when the Bible was finished. Paul must be referring instead to the end of the age and the resurrection. That makes a lot more sense.

But aside from the passage in 1 Corinthians 13, some Christians still question the need for continued direct revelation . . .

Objection #2 Direct revelation is no longer needed because we have the Bible

It is true that we have the Bible and that the Bible is God’s revelation to us and it is completely true. But does that mean there is no longer any value to God speaking to us directly in addition to speaking to us through the Bible? I don’t think so. Let me explain why by sharing some examples of direct revelation from Scripture where the direct revelation was helpful for reasons that still apply to our lives today even though we have the complete Bible.

Example 1: David received different directions for different battles.

In 1 Chronicles 14 we find short accounts of two different battles that David fought against the Philistines. Before the first battle, David seeks God’s guidance and God simply tells David to “go up”:

ESV 1 Chronicles 14:10 And David inquired of God, "Shall I go up against the Philistines? Will you give them into my hand?" And the LORD said to him, "Go up, and I will give them into your hand."

However, when David seeks God’s direction for the next battle, God gives David different guidance. He still directs David to attack, but God directs him not to simply launch a frontal attack:

ESV 1 Chronicles 14:14-15 And when David again inquired of God, God said to him, "You shall not go up after them; go around and come against them opposite the balsam trees. And when you hear the sound of marching in the tops of the balsam trees, then go out to battle, for God has gone out before you to strike down the army of the Philistines."

Sometimes God gives directions through direct revelation which contains specific details for a specific time and place which are not addressed by general principles in the Bible. So, today, God might speak to someone about serving in a specific ministry, or a specific nation overseas, or about reaching out to a specific friend, or He might give guidance concerning any of a number of details which are not covered specifically in the Bible. Should we expect God to give direct revelation to guide us in every such situation? No, I’m not saying that, and the Bible does not lead us to expect that. But there is no reason that God might not sometimes give such direction when, according to His wisdom and the need of the hour, it is helpful. I can’t see how our need for this is less than David’s was. A New Testament example of this was mentioned at the beginning of this blog post. God guided Philip to travel on a specific road and to go share the gospel with a person in a specific chariot that Philip saw. I don’t think evangelism works this way most of the time, but I don’t see any reason at all why God might not sometimes do something similar today when He wants a certain Christian to share with a specific unbeliever at just the right time and place.

Example 2: Peter receives encouragement to go eat with Gentiles, and share the gospel with them.

In Acts 10, Peter receives some direct revelation. God directs Peter to go with some men to the house of a Gentile named Cornelius:

CSB17 Acts 10: 19-20 While Peter was thinking about the vision, the Spirit told him, "Three men are here looking for you. Get up, go downstairs, and go with them with no doubts at all, because I have sent them."

Men were coming to ask Peter to come and share the gospel with Cornelius and his household. Should Peter have needed new direct revelation to know that it was a good idea to go with people who wanted to hear the gospel? Probably not. Peter had heard the Great Commission repeatedly directly from His risen Lord. The Great Commission explicitly included going to the Gentiles (note: the Greek word for “Gentiles” is the exact same as the Greek word for “nations” used in the Great Commission). So why did Peter need direct revelation? When we read the whole story, we can see that even though Jesus had already given the Great Commission, there was a lot of uncertainty about things like eating non-kosher food with Gentiles. Peter was uneasy about this himself, and other Jewish Christians would likely be upset by him going to share the gospel in a setting where he ate with Gentiles (in fact, it appears that they did get upset). So, even though Peter should not have needed new directions to go and share the gospel with Gentiles, maybe He did need a little extra encouragement to do so. God can give us encouragement in many ways to do what we should already know we should do. In Peter’s case, the encouragement included a vision and some words of direct revelation.

Why shouldn’t God give similar encouragement to Christians today when He wants us to do something that, even though we should already know based on the Bible that it is a good thing to do, we nevertheless are afraid to do? What if God calls someone to leave a good paying profession to serve Him in a place and ministry where their finances will likely be difficult? Of if God wants someone to leave the relative safety of a nation like the US and to serve Him in some especially dark and dangerous corner of the world? Isn’t there already enough information in the Bible to indicate that such decisions are good? Yes. But might we still benefit from some additional encouragement from God? Of course! And one way He might give such encouragement is through direct revelation. This would be especially helpful if the direct revelation was in some ways confirmed. I’ll share a relevant story concerning my wife and myself below.

Objection #3 If there is new direct revelation, we would need to keep our Bible in three-ring binders so we could keep adding new pages.

I heard a statement similar to this third objection over twenty years ago while in seminary, and I heard it again in sometime in the last few weeks. It is true that everything in the Bible is “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). Every word in the Bible came to us via direct revelation. However, it is not true that every example of direct revelation is recorded in the Bible. We are told that Philip the evangelist had four daughters who prophesied, yet we do not have any words of their prophecies in the Bible. This means there is no need to add new direct revelations to our Bibles!

Why are some words of direct revelation included in Scripture, while others are not? One simple reason may be that God intended for some things He revealed to be read and believed by all people all around the world, while other things He says are intended only for the person He speaks to, or perhaps to a small local audience like one local church or one family.

We need to keep in mind that the Scriptures we have today were verified to be God’s Word through a long process. In terms of the New Testament, a key element for verifying that a document truly contained God’s Word was that it was written by an Apostle or by someone working closely with an Apostle so that Apostolic approval could be seen. The Apostles themselves were verified to be authentic spokesmen for God both because God worked public signs and wonders through them and also because they were willing to suffer for the gospel. Expecting new personal direct revelation is not at all the same as expecting new books of the Bible, which would require a verification with roughly equal evidence to what God gave for the New Testament. I don’t expect God to reveal new books of the Bible, but I do expect Christians to sometimes experience some of the types of personal words from God that read about in stories in the Bible.

Of course, some false prophets have claimed to receive revelation from God equivalent to the Bible, and this leads us to the final objection I will discuss here:

Objection #4 False claims of new direct revelation have caused too much damage.

Let’s be clear, a huge amount of damage has been done by false claims of direct revelation from God. The false religions of Islam and Mormonism are built on such claims. Some preachers today milk money from the gullible while jetting around in private planes and claiming to hear from God. Jesus warned that “Many false prophets will rise up and deceive many” (Matt. 24:11 CSB17). That has certainly happened.

But should we then assume that all new claims of direct revelation are false? False prophecy is nothing new. All throughout the Old Testament there were false prophets. It seems that false prophets often outnumbered the true ones. And yet, God kept sending true prophets. God expects us to use discernment. I’m not saying it’s easy, but God never promised it would be. Consider this exhortation from John:

CSB17 1 John 4:1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see if they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.

Notice that John did not say that all new prophecy would be false. In fact, why would we need to test the spirits and be on guard against false prophets if every prophet after John (the last author of the New Testament) was false? The warning and the need for testing indicates that some new direct revelation will be true. We mustn’t throw out the baby with the bath water. The bath water may indeed be a filthy ocean of false prophecy and deception. But in this case, the “baby” represents God’s words spoken to the hearts and minds of his people in ways and at times in which He deems it helpful.

While direct revelation can be used to bring helpful guidance and needed encouragement, there are obviously dangers involved. For this reason, I want to share some pastoral advice.

Pastoral Advice

1. Read your Bible. Meditate on God’s Word. Study it and think about it all the time. God consistently speaks to us through the Bible. If we, or someone we know, thinks God has spoken to them directly, the Bible will help us evaluate it. And even when we have truly heard God speak to us directly, we will need biblical principles to help us respond correctly.

2. Pray a lot. Pray in private and pray with other Christians. God can speak to us anytime He chooses, but there are a number of examples in the Bible where God spoke while someone was praying.

3. Don’t treat all cases of direct revelation the same. If you think God has spoken to you directly and wants you to change careers and move with your family to the other side of the world, it is reasonable to seek significant confirmation that this is really from God and not just an idea that popped into your mind. However, if you are waiting for your food at McDonald’s and you think you feel the Spirit prompting you to reach out to a stranger who looks sad and ask some gentle questions that may lead to an opportunity to pray for them, you really don’t need a lot of special confirmation. Just say a quick prayer and go for it!

4. Be humble. If you think God tells you something about someone else or if you think God is giving you direction for someone, be humble. There is biblical precedence for God working in this way, but there is also biblical support for humility. Practically, I recommend saying something more like, “I think God may have shown me . . .,” rather than, “Thus sayeth the Lord . . .”. You probably do not have the prophetic track record and reputation of Isaiah or Paul, so it’s ok to be cautious and humble.

5. If someone thinks God told them something and they turn out to be wrong, it’s not the end of the world. They probably just confused their thoughts for God’s voice. With experience, they will gain better discernment. Of course, if the person didn’t follow the advice in the point above and if they proudly insisted that they knew something based on direct revelation, then their error will be more serious and possibly cause some serious harm. In such a case the person in error may need to be gently confronted and if they don’t repent a process of church discipline might be called for.

6. We need God’s help so that we don’t quench the Spirit by despising prophecy on the one hand, and so that we do not fail to guard ourselves and the church against false prophets on the other hand. Thankfully, God is always ready to help us!

7. Direct revelation can be encouraging but remember that God leads us in many ways. A calling or ministry decision is not less valuable or important if it was not prompted by direct revelation. God very often leads us through the Bible, other Christians, providential circumstances, and wisdom He gives us.

Actual examples can help us think about difficult issues, so I’ll close with one example of direct revelation that my wife and I experienced and then share about a widespread way in which God is speaking to many people today.

Examples

Example #1: Our Calling

I had a NROTC scholarship and majored in Mechanical Engineering.  I met Hope in college and proposed to her several months after I entered the navy. I served on nuclear submarines. I was young and ambitious and thought I would go on to command a submarine one day and perhaps after that to serve as an admiral. Hope expected to be a Navy wife for many years until I retired. We were both committed Christians, but we had never discussed the possibility of full-time ministry, much less the possibility of moving to the other side of the world to work among an unreached people group.

In 1989 I was serving on a submarine homebased in Groton, Connecticut. Our church was holding renewal services (similar to revival services).  These services were originally planned to last one week but due to the large crowds and the sense of the Lord’s working and blessing, they continued for several nights a week every week for around six to eight weeks.  I was able to attend only a couple of times the first week because the submarine I was stationed on went out to sea.  Hope continued to attend as often as she could.

One night the speaker’s message was from the book of Job. He emphasized that we must be willing to give up everything we value for God. Hope had been frustrated since moving to Groton because she had not been able to find a teaching job.  At the end of the message she went forward to surrender her teaching to the Lord.

The speaker had said nothing about missions in his message.  Yet, while praying that night Hope distinctly heard the Lord say to her, “You will follow your husband overseas and teach your own children and others about Jesus.”  It was not an audible voice, but what Hope heard in her mind was clear and specific.  Hope immediately understood this as a call to go overseas to share the truth of God with the unreached.

Hope thought, “How can I follow my husband overseas if Mark doesn’t know this is God’s will?” She decided to send me a cassette tape of the message from the service that night with a short note.  I received the small package with the cassette tape when my sub pulled into port in the Caribbean. Hope did not tell me what she had heard God say to her.  That type of news is better shared in person.  She only encouraged me to listen to the message on the tape.  So, in a room available for off duty crew members, I put the cassette tape into my Walkman and I listened.

That very night the Lord led me to the conclusion that He had prepared me and gifted me in such a way that I should go overseas to share the gospel with the lost. I was so excited about this that I remember walking outside at night and praising God.  This was a radical change of plans, to say the least.  I talked with Hope on the phone, but I did not share this new calling, for I thought that something this big was better shared in person.  Little did I know that God had already told her!

Our submarine returned to Groton right before Thanksgiving.  I told Hope what the Lord had showed me and she in turn told me what she had heard God say.  The way that God unexpectedly gave the same calling to each of us while we were separated by hundreds of miles was a clear and miraculous sign for us.  By God’s providence, my cousin, who had just recently returned from serving the Lord in Africa, was visiting family nearby and we met with him that same week.  He encouraged us in our new direction, and our church also affirmed and supported our calling.  And it came to pass as God said it would when he spoke to Hope.  I had to finish my time in the Navy.  Then we spent three years studying at a Bible seminary.  After that we moved overseas and shared God’s truth and love with others for fourteen years there.

The supernatural nature of our calling gave us extra strength to persevere many times when it was very difficult.

Example #2: Dreams that lead Muslims to Jesus

While living in a Muslim majority nation for fourteen years, I was blessed to meet quite a few people from Muslim backgrounds who had become Christians. Some of these became close friends whom I knew for years. Many of them reported a similar experience. At some point before becoming a Christian they had a supernatural dream in which they either saw Jesus or saw something that led them to believe in Jesus. These dear brothers and sisters faced a great risk of persecution when they became Christians. I don’t think they were making up these dreams. Besides hearing such testimonies from multiple Muslim converts myself, many others have reported the same thing. The Gospel Coalition has a good, moving article on Muslims having dreams that led them to Jesus.

Conclusion

God still speaks today! The main way He speaks to us is through the Bible. But He also still speaks to us directly. This might involve Him speaking words and ideas into our minds, or giving us a supernatural dream, or occasionally even giving someone a prophetic word intended for a limited audience. We need to use discernment. At the same time, we should be thankful when God speaks to us in any way. He really does walk with us and talk with us along life’s way.



Hebrews 13:16 And do not forget to do good and to share with others . . .



Other Bible related questions I have discussed on my blog:


Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Their End is Destruction (4 words that support annihilationism versus either eternal torment or universalism)



Most Christian teachers in my conservative evangelical tradition teach that the final fate of the unrighteous is eternal torment. Many Christians from progressive and theologically liberal traditions teach that the final fate of the unrighteous is that they will all be saved (universalism). But the Apostle Paul teaches that the final fate of the unrighteous is annihilation.

Paul teaches the doctrine of conditional immortality, and the more specific doctrine of annihilation which conditional immortality entails, in a number of places (including in Romans 1:32, Romans 2:12, Romans 6:21-23, Romans 9:22; Galatians 6:8, and 2 Thessalonians 1:9). My focus in this blog post is four words that Paul wrote to the Philippians:

Their end is destruction
(Phil. 3:19a CSB17)

Paul’s words favor annihilation over eternal torment





Before I explain why ἀπώλεια (apōleia), the Greek word translated “destruction,” is much more likely to mean “annihilation” than “eternal torment,” there are a few preliminary points to be made:

1. The Greek word apōleia is a noun. It may be translated “destruction.” The Greek word apollumi is a verb. When used actively it may be translated “to destroy” and when used passively it may be translated “to be destroyed” or “to perish” (see John 3:16). Just as in English the noun destruction refers to either the process or result of something being destroyed, likewise in Greek we expect the noun apoleia to refer to either the result or the process of something being apollumi-ed. Therefore, when seeking to understand what specific type of destruction is intended, it is appropriate and helpful to examine not only the noun apoleia, but also the closely related verb apollumi.

2. Before arguing that Paul was referring to annihilation in Philippians 3:19, it is essential to know what we ourselves mean by annihilation in the context of the doctrine of conditional immortality. By annihilation we do not mean poofing out of existence. What we do mean is the complete and permanent end of life. When annihilation is complete something may possibly be left over like ashes and smoke or dust. What will not remain is any living person who is capable of feeling or knowing anything. In other words, annihilation basically refers to what we normally mean in everyday language by death. For those, like myself, who believe that we have an immaterial part of ourselves which may be called our soul, annihilation involves the death of both the body and the soul (see Matthew 10:28, where apollumi is used to describe what God will do to both the body and soul in hell). Annihilation does not rule out a limited time of conscious suffering before death. In fact, many annihilationists like myself believe that the unrighteous will suffer in some ways at the final judgment prior to perishing.

3. Like nearly all words in all languages, apollumi/ apoleia do not have just one simple, precise meaning which is the same in every context. These words have a range of related meanings and the precise meaning which is intended depends on the context. An especially important part of the context for apollumi/ apoleia is whether, in a given sentence, these words are referring to a person or to an inanimate object. Inanimate objects were never alive or conscious, so of course the meaning “to kill” or “to perish” does not apply to them.

With preliminaries out of the way, we can now look at the evidence that apollumi/ apoleia refers to annihilation, not eternal torment.

When referring to an object like a wineskin, apollumi can mean “to ruin”:

CSB17 Matthew 9:17 And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. Otherwise, the skins burst, the wine spills out, and the skins are ruined (apollumi). No, they put new wine into fresh wineskins, and both are preserved."

If this verse was the only data point we had other than Philippians 3:19, we might be uncertain precisely what the end of the unrighteous is. If, like the ruined wineskin, your skin burst open and your insides poured out, of course you would die. So, this might support annihilationism. However, the wineskin was never alive or conscious to begin with, so it is difficult to compare its fate with the fate of a living person.

When referring to what happens to a person, the basic meaning of apollumi is that the person is killed or dies. This can be seen in many Bible verses including these:

CSB17 Matthew 2:13 After they were gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, "Get up! Take the child and his mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I tell you. For Herod is about to search for the child to kill (apollumi) him."

CSB17 Matthew 8:25 So the disciples came and woke him up, saying, "Lord, save us! We're going to die (apollumi)!"

CSB17 Matthew 12:14 But the Pharisees went out and plotted against him, how they might kill (apollumi) him.

The meaning of apollumi seen in the above three examples (and more could be given) supports annihilation because annihilation claims that the unrighteous do not go on living forever. The unsaved person dies.

Sometimes traditionalists (those who believe in eternal torment) argue that the kind of examples given above do not support annihilation because when a person dies on earth their soul lives on. However, this logic is not sound. When the disciples woke Jesus up during the storm, they did so because they thought they were going to die, not because they thought their souls were going to live on. Likewise, the Pharisees were not plotting how they might cause the soul of Jesus to live on, but rather how they might kill him. The point is that in these verses apollumi is focused on what happens to the body in this world, not what might happen to the soul that leaves the body. The dead body no longer can feel or think anything. When someone dies in this world, their body dies. (I’m assuming dualism is correct, which I personally believe, although I respect my brothers and sisters in Christ who believe otherwise). Only the body is apollumi-ed. However, when God casts a person into hell, both their body and soul will be destroyed (will be apollumi-ed). What happens to the body when a person dies now will happen to both their body and soul if they are not saved through Christ on judgment day. How do we know this? Jesus tells us:

CSB17 Matthew 10:28 Don't fear those who kill the body but are not able to kill the soul; rather, fear him who is able to destroy (apollumi) both soul and body in hell.

This evidence is strong, but it would still be nice if we had examples of other Greek authors using apollumi in a context where they were clearly and unambiguously referring to the final fate of people after death. The authors of the New Testament repeatedly use apollumi in this way, but since their meaning is what is being debated in texts like Philippians 3:19, we can’t use most of these texts to establish the meaning. However, in some biblical texts there is enough context to help us. Consider, for example, John 3:16:

CSB17 John 3:16 For God loved the world in this way: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish (apollumi) but have eternal life.

In John 3:16 “perish” is contrasted with having eternal life. Obviously, those who perish do not have eternal life. They do not live forever. If you don’t live forever, you can’t be tormented forever. So, the ordinary meaning of perish, and of apollumi, is supported, which points to annihilation.

It turns out we also have examples of extrabiblical authors using apollumi when discussing the final fate of people after death in this world. Plato, Plutarch, and Athenagoras all used apollumi to refer to a final fate where all parts of a person, including their souls, completely and permanently perish so that there is no consciousness left at all. None of these Greek authors agreed with annihilation, but they discussed it and they used apollumi to refer to annihilation. There are quite a few examples, so I’ve include them in an appendix below.

When all the data is considered, it is nearly certain that when Paul wrote “Their end is destruction” he was referring to annihilation, not eternal torment.

Paul’s words favor annihilation over universalism





Philippians 3:19 is even more difficult for universalists than it is for traditionalists. First, all the evidence above that by “destruction” Paul means the same thing that we mean by “annihilation” argues against universalism. If some people are annihilated, then those people don't receive the gift of eternal life. But what makes these words of Paul even more difficult for the universalist is that Paul is discussing “their end.”

If “destruction” means anything negative (and it certainly is not a positive word!), then the universalist is left with the difficult task of explaining how some people have a negative end when they claim all people are eventually saved.

I’ve heard universalists argue that it is only the sinful nature of the unsaved which is destroyed. But in Philippians 3:19 the word “their” is referring to people. It is not referring to their flesh or their sinful nature, it is referring to them. The New Testament authors knew the difference between people and their sin nature, and they sometimes do discuss the destruction of our sinful nature. However, this verse is talking about the end of people.

Sometimes universalists argue that any terrible fate mentioned (like being thrown into hell or put into fire) is indeed painful but serves as a process of purifying people and/or leading people to faith in Christ and that the outcome of this process is that everyone will be saved. However, in Philippians 3:19, Paul is teaching that for some people their end (Greek: telos) is destruction. Telos refers to an outcome, not a process that leads to an outcome. Their end is not salvation, their end is destruction.

Similar verses

Philippians 3:19 is not the only verse where we see that the end of the unrighteous is a fate that ends their lives. Perhaps the closest parallel is found in Romans 6:21-23, as seen in this graphic:





In Roman 6:21-23, Paul is contrasting two different outcomes (two different telos). Some will experience death. This death is contrasted with eternal life. Only those who are saved through faith in Christ Jesus have eternal life. The others do not receive this gift and thus do not live forever. Since they do not live forever, they can neither experience salvation (which involves eternal life) nor eternal torment (which requires living forever, since you can’t torment a dead person).

Similarly, consider this passage from 2 Corinthians:

CSB17 2 Corinthians 11:14 And no wonder! For Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
15 So it is no great surprise if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end (telos) will be according to their works.

Here, Paul says that the end of some false teachers will be what their works deserve. This passage by itself does not rule out eternal torment (plenty of other passages do that), but it certainly rules out the happy ending for all that is proposed by universalists.

There are other ways to refer to how people’s lives will turn out than referring to their telos. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus contrasts two different endings by using the figure of two different roads. These roads do not lead to the same place in the end!

CSB17 Matthew 7:13 "Enter through the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the road broad that leads to destruction (apōleia), and there are many who go through it.
14 How narrow is the gate and difficult the road that leads to life, and few find it.

This is yet another passage that teaches conditional immortality while ruling out both eternal torment and universalism. It rules out universalism because Jesus says only a few find the gate that leads to life. He doesn’t say that some find it now and others will find it later. He says few find it. Further, He says that many go through a gate that results in destruction. Here, destruction (apoleia!) is contrasted with life, so it does not make sense to say destruction is referring to a type of ongoing miserable life. Besides, we’ve already seen the linguistic data that indicates apoleia and apollumi were used to refer to annihilation.

Conclusion

With just four words in Philippians 3:19, Paul teaches us an important truth. Those who live as enemies of the cross have an end. Their end will be neither eternal torment nor eternal glory. It will be apōleia: an eternal, permanent annihilation.

The good news is that we have a Savior. Those who have faith in Christ can look forward to a much better ending. We will receive new bodies that will be like the glorified body of Jesus. These new bodies will be incorruptible (no more growing old, stiff, and feeble) and immortal (no more death). Our new bodies also will no longer constantly pull us away from the will of God through deceitful desires.






Hebrews 13:16 And do not forget to do good and to share with others . . .



Appendix: Greek Authors using apollumi to refer to annihilation.

Helpful note: After each quote by Plato and Plutarch, I include a reference that you can click on. It will take you to the appropriate page on the online Perseus Digital Library. The English translation will be on the left side of the page. On the right side of the page, if you click the “load” button in the section labeled “Greek,” the accompanying Greek text will appear.  In addition to noting the uses of apollumi that refer to annihilation, I have also highlighted (put in bold) some other Greek words that New Testament authors used to refer to the final fate of the ungodly.

Plato

They fear that when the soul leaves the body it no longer exists anywhere, and that on the day when the man dies it is destroyed and perishes (apollumi), and when it leaves the body and departs from it, straightway it flies away and is no longer anywhere, scattering like a breath or smoke.

“But the soul, the invisible, which departs into another place which is, like itself, noble and pure and invisible, to the realm of the god of the other world in truth, to the good and wise god, whither, if God will, my soul is soon to go,—is this soul, which has such qualities and such a nature, straightway scattered and destroyed (apollumi) when it departs from the body, as most men say?

Now what shall we say to this argument, if anyone claims that the soul, being a mixture of the elements of the body, is the first to perish (apollumi) in what is called death?

And, Cebes, I believe, granted that the soul is more lasting than the body, but said that no one could know that the soul, after wearing out many bodies, did not at last perish (apollumi) itself upon leaving the body; and that this was death—the destruction (olethros) of the soul, since the body is continually being destroyed. Are those the points, Simmias and Cebes, which we must consider?”

. . . but its [the soul’s] very entrance into the human body was the beginning of its dissolution (olethros), a disease, as it were; and it lives in toil through this life and finally perishes (apollumi) in what we call death.

If the immortal is also imperishable, it is impossible for the soul to perish (apollumi) when death comes against it.

“But,” he said, “it is not needed, so far as that is concerned; for surely nothing would escape destruction (phthoron), if the immortal, which is everlasting, is perishable (phthoron).”
“All, I think,” said Socrates, “would agree that God and the Principle of life, and anything else that is immortal, can never perish (apollumi).”

“Have you never perceived,” said I, “that our soul is immortal and never perishes (apollumi)?”

Plutarch

And they are discomposed when they hear it said of any one, he is perished (apollumi), or he is gone, or he is no more;

Athenagoras

. . . for God has not made us as sheep or beasts of burden, a mere by-work, and that we should perish (apollumi) and be annihilated (aphanizo).
Apology by Athenagoras, Chapter 31

On the contrary, it is reasonable to suppose, that those who think they shall have no account to give of the present life, ill or well spent, and that there is no resurrection, but calculate on the soul perishing with (sunapollumi) the body, and being as it were quenched in it, will refrain from no deed of daring; but as for those who are persuaded that nothing will escape the scrutiny of God, but that even the body which has ministered to the irrational impulses of the soul, and to its desires, will be punished along with it, it is not likely that they will commit even the smallest sin.
Apology by Athenagoras, Chapter 36

Helpful note:
The best free places I could find to read Athenagoras’s Apology are:

For English:

For Greek (ignore the Russian translation on the right, unless you speak Russian!):



Related Resources for Further Study

I preached a two-part sermon introducing the biblical basis for annihilationism to the church I serve. Here is that sermon on YouTube:

Part 1:

Part 2:

A ten minute explainer video on annihilation:

A collection of resources:

In the conclusion to the blog post, I mentioned how our new glorified bodies will no longer have evil desires. If you want to read more about that encouraging topic, see this blog post: