Most Christians who read and study their Bible,
listen to sermons, and read Christian books sooner or later struggle with
questions about predestination.
Many Christians don’t like the idea of
predestination because it feels unfair. I
think the problem is not with predestination itself, but with a lack of
understanding about how predestination is related to foreknowledge. Once we understand what the Bible says about
predestination and foreknowledge, it is easy to see how predestination is
actually a good and encouraging truth which is entirely consistent with God’s
justice, love, and even with our free will.
There are two Bible passages which explicitly link
God’s foreknowledge with predestination.
The first passage is Romans 8:29.
This passage shows us several things about
predestination and foreknowledge:
1. The
foreknowledge is knowledge related to people, as indicated by the phrase “those
whom.”
2. This
foreknowledge in some way logically precedes and leads to predestination.
3. The
passage does NOT say that God predestines who will have faith.
4. The
passage DOES say that God makes a destiny for us whom He foreknew, and that
destiny is to become like Jesus.
The second passage which links foreknowledge and
predestination is 1 Peter 1:1-2.
This passage shows us some truths similar to the
truths we saw in Romans:
1. Being “elect”
(which pretty much everyone agrees is the same thing as being chosen or
predestined) is based on God’s foreknowledge.
That’s what “according to the foreknowledge of God the Father” means.
2. The
passage does NOT say that God chooses who will have faith.
3. The
passage does indicate that election has to do with both sanctification and forgiveness. Sanctification is the process where we become
more and more like Jesus, so this is the same thing that Paul described in
Romans 8:29 using the words “to be conformed to the image of His Son”.
What
Specific Foreknowledge Leads to Predestination?
The Bible does not specifically tell us. We can’t say for sure. But I think it is possible that Paul and
Peter were both referring to the fact that God knew ahead of time who, given
the right opportunities and circumstances and help from Him, would freely
accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
In other words, I don’t think the Bible is
teaching that God predetermined who would have faith in Jesus. Rather, I think the Bible is teaching that
God knew ahead of time who would have faith in Jesus. Then, based on that
knowledge, God made a plan (a destiny, a predestination) for these people that
their sins would be forgiven and they would be transformed to become like Jesus,
and they would live in glory with God forever.
When you understand predestination in this way,
you immediately realize that there is nothing unfair about it. In fact, you see that it is an amazing act of
love. Even though we have faith in
Jesus, we never could have saved ourselves. We never could have changed
ourselves from being sinful people to being people who are like Jesus. But God makes sure this happens for everyone
whom He knew would be willing to accept Him.
My destiny is not in doubt, and neither is yours,
if you believe in Jesus. Predestination
is wonderful! Thank God for
predestination! God has chosen our
destination, and it’s a really good one!
What
Does This Have to Do With Calvinism and Arminianism?
You don’t have to understand the terms “Calvinism”
and “Arminianism”. These terms are not
in the Bible. However, since many Christians use these terms, you might want to
know a little about them. These terms
refer to two ways of understanding how predestination works. There’s a lot more to Calvinism and
Arminianism than this, but this is part of it.
The view I just shared above has a technical
name: “conditional election.” This view, which represents my best effort to
understand the Bible on this issue, is consistent with Arminianism. That doesn’t
mean that I am committed to the full system of beliefs which are related to
Arminianism, but it does mean that I lean toward an Arminian understanding of
predestination.
Calvinists understand the Bible to teach “unconditional
election.” They believe that God chose
ahead of time who would have saving faith and who would not, and that God’s
choice had nothing at all to do with anything He knew ahead of time about what
each person would do or would be like.
If you want to know how they explain the passage in Romans and the one
in 1 Peter we looked at above, it is best to ask a Calvinist.
Since
I Lean Towards Arminianism, How Do I Feel About Calvinists?
I thank God for my brothers and sisters in Christ
who are Calvinists. Although we disagree
on some points of doctrine, we share a common faith in our Lord and Savior
Jesus Christ. We are on the same
team! I have been greatly blessed by the
preaching, teaching, and writing ministries of men like John Piper, Wayne
Grudem, and the late John Stott, all of whom are (or in Stott’s case, was)
Calvinist. Learning from them is like
eating a fish. You eat the meat and
throw out the bones. In the case of
these men, I have found them serving up huge amounts of delicious, nutritious
fish meat which rarely contains more than a few small bones. They are advancing the work of God, and I
thank God for them. I feel the same way about less famous Calvinists I know.
It’s fine to discuss issues like this, and they
are not unimportant, but I hope Christians will not divide over issues like
Arminianism vs. Calvinism. Sadly, some
do.
Further
Research and Thanks
If you want to do more research on this topic, in
addition to googling words like “conditional election”, “Arminianism”, and “Calvinism”,
you can google “Molinism”.
Finally, all of us, Calvinists and Arminians alike,
should thank God for His great grace, and specifically, that He made a plan for
our salvation and uses His great wisdom and power to ensure that plan succeeds.
Hebrews 13:16 And do not forget to do good and to share with others . . .
Mark, I read with interest and sad to say that I am still confused. I have listened to Brent's sermons and explanations and to yours. I guess I am half Calvinist and half arminian. I lean a little more toward your explanation but neither view changes the fact that I am saved by the grace of God and don't have to worry about it. God bless all of the Pastors in my life who have helped Me understand the Bible better, if not perfectly <><
ReplyDeleteI agree that neither view changes the fact that we are saved by the grace of God. Amen! This is not a topic we need to understand completely or clearly in order to serve God effectively. Nor is it a topic we should allow to divide us. But it is a topic which many Christians, including myself, have thought about. So I have tried to humbly share my understanding.
DeleteMark Corbett's concept of "foreknowledge" is more Arminian than Calvinist. I would rather equate foreknowleged with preordained. Mark Corbett explains foreknowledge by saying "that God knew ahead of time who, given the right opportunities and circumstances and help from Him, would freely accept Jesus Christ and Lord." Let me ask these questions: Was it not God who created "the right opportunities" and the right "circumstances" for the elect? Was it not God who "helped" the elect to make the right decision to accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior? In his natural state, man is at enmity with God. Left alone and by himself, man will never repent and accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. To believe in and accept Christ, man needs repenteance and saving grace, both of which are gifts from God. We thus see that man cannot depend on his so-called free will to believe in and accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. God has to actively assist him by giving him the gifts of repentance and saving faith. With due respecft to the Arminians, I not not believe that their understanding of "foreknowledge" is biblicaly correct. I believe that foreknowledge means that even befre the fondation of the world the elect were preordained to have a loving relationship with God and God has preordained them to salvation. Salvation is sola gratia (by grace alone). If salvations depends partly on the free will of man, then salvation is longer by grace alone.
ReplyDelete