The Bible teaches that a person is saved when they hear the gospel
and respond with repentance and true belief in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 1:13). It
also teaches that belief in Jesus is the only
way to salvation (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Those who have been saved long
to see others also saved. This often
results in wrestling with a difficult question:
What
happens to those who haven’t heard the Good News about Jesus?
Sometimes people try to use this question as a type of rhetorical
weapon to demonstrate that Jesus can’t possibly be the only way of salvation.
Oprah, echoing the thoughts of many before her, once asked the question in this
way, as you can see in this 2 minute video clip (sorry, the picture is somewhat
fuzzy, but the sound is clear):
So, what about those who haven’t heard? This is one of those
questions which the Bible does not answer in an explicit, direct way. But that doesn’t mean the Bible does not
address this question. Let’s consider
what may be the most important passage on this issue. I encourage you to slow down and thoughtfully
read this, even if you are already familiar with it:
Romans 10:9 If you declare with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and
believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
10 For it is with your heart that
you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your
faith and are saved.
11 As Scripture says, "Anyone
who believes in him will never be put to shame."
12 For there is no difference
between Jew and Gentile-- the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all
who call on him,
13 for, "Everyone who calls on
the name of the Lord will be saved."
14 How, then, can they call on the
one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they
have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them?
15 And how can anyone preach unless
they are sent? As it is written: "How beautiful are the feet of those who
bring good news!"
It’s as if God says, “You should be worried about those people who
haven’t heard. Here’s My solution: YOU go tell them. If you can’t go, then give and pray so that
someone else can go.”
Admittedly, that’s not the type of answer people are looking
for. But it is the type of answer God
gives in His Word, which means it is the best type of answer and the most
important type of answer. It’s a
practical answer, so let’s stop and think a little about some practical
applications of the truth that is declared in the verses above.
Practical
Application #1: People Who are Asking
about those Who Haven’t Heard are People who Have Heard
If a non-Christian is asking about people who have never heard as
an objection to the truth of the Bible (and I’ve heard it asked that way), it
may help to gently remind them that they
are not in that category. If God makes
any special provisions for those who haven’t heard, these provisions would NOT
apply to the person who is asking about them, since they obviously have heard the gospel. If they reject
the gospel now, the Bible offers NO guarantee that they will have another
chance tomorrow (Hebrews 3:15, Proverbs 27:1, Isaiah 55:6). Not only are they not in the category of
people who have not had a chance to hear the gospel, most people who are asking
about those who haven’t had a chance to hear have never met anyone in this
category. Very likely all their friends, family members, coworkers, and
neighbors have had and do have many chances to hear the Good News. It’s urgent that they accept God’s gracious
offer of forgiveness and eternal life in Christ Jesus (Acts 2:40).
Practical
Application #2: We Should Have a Passion to Spread the Gospel Where Christ is
not yet Known
Paul certainly practiced what he preached. He himself had a burning passion to
continually go to new areas where Christ is not yet known. A little later in
Romans he writes:
NIV Romans 15:20a
It has always been my ambition to preach the gospel where Christ was not known,
We’re not all called to go to unreached
people groups, but we should each do what we can to support such work. This includes:
* Learning about the unreached.
* Training up Christians to go to the
unreached.
* Financially supporting those who go.
* Praying for those who go (this is really
important)
* Being open to go
Practical Application #3: Working to
Overcome Language Barriers in Difficult Areas
Today, the main barrier to people hearing the
gospel is not geographic distance. The
main barrier to hearing the gospel is languages where the Bible is not available
and where few, in any, who speak that language are sharing the gospel. By God’s grace there are now at least some
Christians in every political nation in the world. But when the Jesus spoke of “all nations” in
the Great Commission He was referring to all ethnic people groups, not merely
all political nations. Some political
nations have many different ethnic people groups living in them and these
ethnic people groups often speak different languages. For example, we lived in Indonesia for
fourteen years. Just on the island we
lived on (Sulawesi) there are estimated to be over 100 different languages
spoken. These are truly different languages,
not merely different dialects (there are often multiple dialects of each of the
languages!). Many of those over 100
local languages include many speakers who have not heard the gospel, and have
very little or no opportunity to hear it in their language.
We’ve come a long way in completing the Great
Commission, but there is still a long ways to go. The cost of completing our task is high. Most of the unreached live in areas where
there is intense opposition to the gospel. There is a great need for more people
willing to go long term because it takes years to learn a new language and culture
and win people and disciple them.
I feel that these “practical applications”
related to the Great Commission and its urgency are the most important thing we
should get out of the Bible’s teaching about those who have not heard. But because so many people struggle with the
theological implications of this teaching, I will go on to share a few more
thoughts.
Dangerous Speculation
Some people speculate that perhaps people who
live in remote areas and who die without a chance to hear the gospel will be
given a chance to accept Jesus after they die. While the Bible does not
explicitly rule this possibility out, we need to consider how this speculative
solutions fits, or doesn’t fit, with the logic of Romans 10:9-15. When Paul asks, “how can they believe in Him
whom they have not heard”, his solution is NOT that those people will get a
chance after they die. In fact, the logic of needing to go and preach would be
undermined if there were chances to believe after death.
An Analogy
Here’s my own version of an analogy I’ve
heard elsewhere (but I don’t remember where or from whom):
Imagine there is a man in an apartment
building. He lives on the 5th floor. His building catches on fire.
By the time he wakes up the four floors below him are on fire and the floor
above him is on fire and the fire is burning outside his apartment in the
hallway. He’s trapped. Thankfully, a
fire truck with a long ladder shows up.
A fireman appears outside his window and calls him to come and
escape.
The trapped man says, “I think there might be
a hidden fireproof escape under the rug somewhere. I’ll look for that.”
The fireman yells, “How do you know it’s
there? Did the builder of the apartments
tell you it was there?”
The trapped man replies, “No, but it makes
sense to me that there would be a fire escape under a trap door under the
carpet.”
Should the man look for the fire escape just
because it makes sense in his mind that there should be one? Shouldn’t he
instead focus on the one way out (the fireman with the ladder)? Does it make sense
for people to speculate on a chance for salvation after death? The Bible says nothing about that. The “builder” hasn’t told us such a thing
exists. Shouldn’t we just focus on the
means of salvation which God has made available? Namely, going and telling
people now, in this life, the Good News.
How this Might All Harmonize with God’s Justice, Goodness, and
Foreknowledge
Still, people are understandably concerned
about those who died without hearing.
But it is wrong to assume that the only way God can be fair and good to
those people is if He gives them a chance to believe and be saved after death.
God has not revealed in detail how He is fair to those who die without
hearing, but we should have no doubt that God is entirely just in all He does. “Will
not the judge of all the earth do right?” (Genesis 18:25).
We should remember that it is not unjust for
God to judge people for their sins and destroy their bodies and souls in hell
(Matthew 10:28). That is what ALL people
deserve based on our sins (Romans 3:23, 6:23).
But there might be more to it.
For example, it is possible that God has used his foreknowledge to
arrange the world in such a way that everyone who would benefit by hearing the
gospel does indeed hear the gospel. The Bible does teach that God determines
when and where people will live (Acts 17:26). He may place those who would not
have believed even if they heard the gospel in times and locations where the
gospel has not been available. It is a possibility. God might not explicitly tell us this because
we might be tempted to wrongly interpret it as meaning our Great Commission is
less urgent. I share this possibility not because I know this is how it works,
but to counter the type of thinking I hear from some universalists and others
that God essentially MUST give unsaved people a chance to repent after death or
else God is not really just, good, and loving.
Conclusion
It is not wrong for us to be concerned about those who have not
heard. In fact, it is right and Biblical to care about them. It is a sign of the Holy Spirit working in
our hearts to move us to complete the Great Commission which Christ gave us. Nor do I think it is wrong to think about the
theological and philosophical implications of this issue. But God’s main response is an urgently
practical one. Our concern about this
issue should first and foremost inspire us to make every effort and great
sacrifices to go and share the gospel with the unreached. Jesus will be with us
as we go (Matthew 28:20).
I have always approached this from a different angle. I have found it fascinating that so many Protestant groups have made Romans the center of their interpretation of all Bible passages. It seems that everything needs to pass through Romans, and in particular, through the lense of faith that they see Romans laying out.
ReplyDeleteHave you ever stopped a moment to contemplate what's more valuable than faith? Paul did. Paul tells us very explicitly what's more valuable than faith.
The First Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians 13:13 -- For these three things are abiding, faith, and hope, and love; but the greatest of these is love.
But that's not the only place that the Bible talks about love.The Epistle of John the Apostle, Known as First John 4:7-8 -- Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
And of course, Christ himself had a lot to say about love, but in particular this:
The Gospel According to St. John 13:34-35 -- A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
On these (and others) I have built my own analogy. If instead of presuming that love is an attribute of God I presume that self-sacrificial love is the substance of God, it changes a little of what it means to believe in God and to know Christ. I make the analogy to a fundamental field, such as the electromagnetic field.
My own elevator pitch is based on this understating of God as self-sacrificial love. Love is self-sacrifice: the giving of yourself in such a way as to benefit the object of your love. Love exists, and makes choices, and has power. Love made us to Love us, exhibit itself, and for us to Love it. Love cannot be without the choice to choose otherwise, and that choice can only be real if there are some who actually chose otherwise. In order to be fully the same thing as Love, Christ entered the world and fully gave himself to us to die a humiliating death at the hands of and on behalf of those who had chosen otherwise. Christ sent his Love forward to join with those who chose to be an expression of Love in the world. We have the choice to be an expression of the Love that sent Christ, of Christ, of the Love Christ sends, and to express our love through study, through emulation, and through obedience. What do you choose?
There are implications of this relevant to the question you've asked. If I went back in time and dropped a couple of bar magnets in a cave, the chances of a family living in that cave building smartphones and the Internet with is extremely slim. No matter how unlikely it is, there was a first person to realize that somewhere, though.
Similarly, Christ came and gave us the spiritual equivalent of Maxwell's equations. (There's more to what he did, but not less.) There's a select few who might somehow discover love of neighbor on their own. But that jump from realizing you should love your neighbor to loving love itself is an awful big jump for most people. (Even with the New Testament, how many people completely gloss over love?)
Yet at the same time that I say finding love is difficult and unlikely, it doesn't feel like it should be. It's not like anyone has ever made it to age five thinking, "Darn it all, I don't know if I like being loved."
That my two cents from a different angle, though.
I have a few blog posts that touch on this theory if you want more details.
https://shaunckennedy.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/what-is-your-elevator-pitch/
https://shaunckennedy.wordpress.com/2018/09/18/can-your-faith-save-you/
https://shaunckennedy.wordpress.com/2018/09/05/justice-and-mercy/
https://shaunckennedy.wordpress.com/2018/09/20/what-comes-after-mercy/
https://shaunckennedy.wordpress.com/2018/12/19/on-kosher-foods/
First reply: Shaun, you said "there are implications of this relevant to the question you've asked." I don't really understand from what you wrote what those implications are. Could you lay them out a little more explicitly?
DeleteSecond Reply: Shaun, I agree that in some ways love is greater than faith. The Bible does teach that. But your post almost implies (I'm not sure if this is intended) a contradiction between faith in God and loving God. The two go together. Those who have true faith in God love Him and those who truly love Him have faith in Him. Also, Romans is in harmony with what the Bible teaches about love. In fact, love is a major theme in Romans, as I explained in another blog post, here: https://parresiazomai.blogspot.com/2017/05/love-in-romans.html
DeleteBlogger comments are limited in length and I don't want to take over your whole blog with five or six consecutive replies.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be far more accurate to say that what we have come to call "faith" is very different than what the New Testament authors called "faith." Your blog kind of gets at this. Faith as you've laid out out seems to be connected to certain historical facts and theological formulas. Not exclusively an acknowledgement of them, but very much dependent on them. That does not seem to be what the New Testament authors had in time. You won't find anyplace where faith is demonstrated by listing a bunch of facts. (Which is where the faith vs works conversation usually gets started.) And what does James say about showing his faith? Not "I will show my faith by listing facts." Faith is about being loyal more than knowing facts. And Paul points out that God has not been hidden from other people, so if there were facts that we need to be saved, they'd be facts that were available to everyone at all times in all places. That's not knowledge of the crucifixion and the resurrection, the Trinity, which books are in scripture, etc. That doesn't change the importance of the historical event. (I'm a penal substitution guy.) But much like being factually ignorant of Maxwell's equations won't stop you from using a smartphone, being factually ignorant of the historical facts of the crucifixion and resurrection doesn't prevent it from saving you. But if you don't actively believe in electricity you won't plug in your phone and if you don't actively believe in the self-sacrificial love that is God you can't be a part of God's redemption. But someone who knows Maxwell's equations well and all that they imply can do a lot more than just use a smartphone, likewise we can do a lot more when we know that love has come to us than just a vague feeling that it must be true. I mean, that much seems to have been enough for Abraham, David, and Elijah, but barely and the list of those who obviously didn't get it in the Old Testament is a whole lot longer than those who obviously did get it. I don't see that we can reasonably expect better percentages in places that weren't founded by a guy that God literally gave superpowers to on par to take down a world superpower and then went on to actually write the two greatest commandments. (It's even disputable whether said superhero himself got it, even though he wrote it.)
Shaun, you wrote: "You won't find anyplace where faith is demonstrated by listing a bunch of facts."
DeleteI believe that basically "faith" in the Bible refers to "trust." We are saved by trusting Jesus. It is relational. But that does not mean that our faith is not also based on some basic facts. It is. Consider what Paul wrote in Romans:
8 On the contrary, what does it say? The message is near you, in your mouth and in your heart. This is the message of faith that we proclaim:
9 If you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
10 One believes with the heart, resulting in righteousness, and one confesses with the mouth, resulting in salvation.
(Rom. 10:8-10 CSB17)
Here, faith includes the specific fact that God raised Jesus from the dead. This is similar to what we find is 1 Corinthians:
CSB17 1 Corinthians 15:1 Now I want to make clear for you, brothers and sisters, the gospel I preached to you, which you received, on which you have taken your stand
2 and by which you are being saved, if you hold to the message I preached to you-- unless you believed in vain.
3 For I passed on to you as most important what I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,
4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, (1 Cor. 15:1-4 CSB17)
Peter also sees the resurrection of Jesus as being tied to our faith:
CSB17 1 Peter 1:21 Through him you believe in God, who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.
So while faith is not MERELY agreement with a bunch of facts, biblical faith does depend on believing that Jesus is Lord, that He died for our sins, and that He rose from the dead.
I think there's a confusion between the fact and the knowledge of the fact in what you're saying. Paul also says:
ReplyDeleteRomans 1:20-21 (ASV) For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, [even] his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse:
because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.
No one very far outside the Roman world had the details of the crucifixion revealed to them, so obviously Paul has something else in mind.
He also talks about Abraham's faith.
Romans 4:3 (ASV) For what saith the scripture? And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness.
And the faith of Abraham is equated with ours.
Galatians 3:9 (ASV) So then they that are of faith are blessed with the faithful Abraham.
And Abraham didn't have the details of the crucifixion or resurrection. There's good reason to think that he wasn't Trinitarian. (At least not in the way we are.) When it comes down to Theological formulas and historical facts, if that is what saves us it needs to be something shared between the patriarchs and the apostles, not something exclusive to one or the other.
Even Christ seems to agree, though.
Matthew 12:31-32 (ASV) Therefore I say unto you, Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men; but the blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven.
And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in that which is to come.
This is said in the context of those who try to dismiss his miracles. The message is clear: they won't be damned because they questioned him, as in the historical fact standing with a name and a birthday. They'll be damned because they saw good things being done as a threat to their power. Instead of choosing love and rejoicing with those who were healed, they turned away from loving their neighbor to cling to their power and influence. The one who stands by and says, "Yeah, David Copperfield did the same thing at Reno last year, but I'm glad it worked for you and let me pour you a drink," doesn't seem to be in as much danger. (For example, the man born blind who said, "I don't know who healed me," and his parents and their friends and family. At least until Christ came back and gave him more information.)
None of that changes the fact of what saves us, the question is how much of that fact is known. How much of electromagnetic theory of the composition of the Earth's mantle do you need to know to use a compass? Yet without the fact that magnets behave a particular way and the fact that the mantle has a particular composition your compass won't work. It's just not dependant on your depth of knowledge about it.