I thank God for John Piper
and the work God has done and continues to do through him. I have been one of many to benefit from Piper’s
books, sermons, and articles. I was blessed with the opportunity to serve the
Lord in the world’s largest Muslim nation for fourteen years. During those years my coworkers and I were
often encouraged and strengthened to continue in a very difficult ministry by
things Piper wrote or said. And just last night, not knowing that I would be writing
this article this morning, I used an
article of Piper as part of a Bible study at the church where I serve. And
if I had known that I would be writing this article this morning, I still would
not have hesitated to use Piper’s article last night.
Having said all that, I
believe that Piper is simply wrong about the nature of hell and the fate of the
unrighteous. A good, godly man who God uses mightily can occasionally be just
plain wrong. An
excerpt from a message he gave on the topic of Hell was just posted this
morning at the Desiring God website. I
won’t be quoting every word of Piper’s article, so I encourage you to read it
for yourself, it’s not long.
Why I’m Convinced that John Piper’s Message is Wrong
Here I’ll go point by
point through the transcript of the excerpt from Piper’s message. Piper is
defending a view which is often called Eternal Conscious Torment (ECT). I believe in a view called Conditional
Immortality or Annihilationism. As an evangelical conditionalist, I’m
convinced that the Bible teaches that the unrighteous will be raised to face
judgment, experience a finite amount of conscious suffering, and then perish
(John 3:16), be destroyed in body and soul (Matthew 10:28), and burned to ashes
(2 Peter 2:6).
1. Piper Quotes
Mark 9:43-48 as Support for ECT
“And if your hand
causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than
with two hands to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire. And if your foot causes
you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life lame than with two
feet to be thrown into hell. And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out. It
is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes
to be thrown into hell,
'where their worm
does not die and the fire is not quenched.'” (Mark 9:43-48 ESV)
When Jesus spoke
these words he included quotes from the last verse of Isaiah:
ESV Isaiah 66:24
"And they shall go out and look on the
dead bodies of the men who have rebelled against me. For their worm shall
not die, their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to
all flesh."
Notice that the
fire that is not quenched and worms that do not die are NOT being used to
torture living people. They are being
used to consume “dead bodies” after judgment.
That makes a lot of sense because all over the world and all throughout
history the vast majority of dead bodies have been disposed of either by worms
turning them into dust or fire turning them into ashes. So the words Jesus speaks in Mark 9 actually
support Annihilationism, not Eternal Conscious Torment.
2. Piper Quotes
Mark 3:29 as Support for ECT
ESV Mark 3:29
but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is
guilty of an eternal sin"
Annihilationists
and traditionalists both agree that there is sin that will never be
forgiven. Piper is probably using this
verse to refute Universalism. I agree
that this verse refutes Universalism. It
says nothing one way or the other about whether those not forgiven will be
tormented forever or be permanently destroyed in both body and soul (Matthew
10:28) forever.
3. Piper Quotes
Matthew 25:41 and 46 as Support for ECT
ESV Matthew 25:41 "Then he will say to those
on his left, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for
the devil and his angels. (Matt. 25:41 ESV)
ESV Matthew 25:46 And these will go away into
eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
Piper is correct in insisting that eternal punishment
will last as long as eternal life.
Again, this is a strong argument against Universalism. However, it is not a strong argument against
Annihilationism. Annihilationism is a
form of eternal punishment. Once people
are completely destroyed, they will never, for all eternity, return to life and
enjoy the pleasures of knowing God and being with Him.
Many people wrongly think that “eternal punishment” must
refer to a process of punishing which continues forever. That is simply not true. Consider the use of the same word “eternal”
in Hebrews:
ESV Hebrews
6:1-2 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to
maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of
faith toward God, and of instruction about washings, the laying on of hands,
the resurrection of the dead, and eternal
judgment.
“Eternal judgment”
does not refer to a process of judging which goes on forever. It refers to a judgment with eternal,
permanent consequences. In the same way “eternal
punishment” does not refer to a process of punishing which goes on
forever. It refers to a punishment with
eternal, permanent consequences.
As far as the
phrase “eternal fire” goes, it should be noted that the fire being eternal does
not mean that what is cast into it must remain alive and conscious. God’s glory is presented in terms of intense,
glowing, burning, fiery light throughout the Bible. “Eternal fire” may refer to this
manifestation of His glory. This fire of
God will be glorious to behold when we are made perfect. But the same fire destroys all who are
impure. Notice that the same phrase, “eternal
fire” is used in Jude 1:7 to refer to God’s destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah. Yet fire is not currently
burning there. Peter Grice provided this
excellent explanation:
“Fire
from heaven—the consuming fire of God—may be considered eternal at its source,
without this meaning that any manifestation or emanation of it must continue to
burn forever.” (From Annihilation
in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 (Part 1))
4. Piper Quotes 2 Thessalonians 1:7-9 as Support
for ECT
ESV 2 Thessalonians 1:7
and to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord
Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels 8 in flaming
fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not
obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. 9 They will suffer the punishment
of eternal destruction, away from
the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might,
It has always
seemed strange to me that proponents of eternal conscious torment have thought
that the phrase “eternal destruction” supports their view. “Destruction” does not mean “torment” in
English, nor do the Greek words translated “destruction/destroy” mean “torment”.
For excellent,
detailed discussions of this passage, see the article by Peter Grice quoted
from above, together with part
2 of the article, and this one by Reese
Watt.
5. Piper Quotes
from Revelation to Support ECT
The only book of
the Bible which actually mentions eternal torment is the book of
Revelation. This is a book full of visions
which use a lot of symbolism. Piper
fails to note that John gives us the interpretation of the lake of fire:
ESV Revelation
20:14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the
second death, the lake of fire.
The lake of fire is
a symbol for dying a second time. John
tells us so. There is a LOT of evidence
which supports the view that the lake of fire and the “second death” refer to
the annihilation of the unrighteous, not their eternal torment. I have written a series of blog posts on this
specific topic which begin here.
What Piper Leaves Out
In the excerpt
provided by Desiring God, Piper does not address the many Bible passages which
give strong support to annihilationism.
Here are just a few:
Psalm 37. In this
Psalm, David says the wicked will wither and die away like grass (Psalm
37:2), be destroyed (Psalm 37:9), “be no more” (Psalm
37:10) so that even if you go looking for them you cannot find them, will
perish (Psalm
37:20), will go up in smoke like grass consumed in a fire (Psalm
37:20), will be “completely destroyed” (Psalm
37:28), will pass away and be no more (Psalm
37:36), and will have no future (Psalm
37:38). That sure sounds like
annihilation!
ESV Matthew
10:28 And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul.
Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
ESV John 3:16
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever
believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
ESV Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in
Christ Jesus our Lord.
ESV 2 Peter 2:6
if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes he condemned them to
extinction, making them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;
How Piper Helped Me Become an Annihilationist
After receiving a
call from the Lord to go overseas and share His Good News among unreached
people groups, I read Piper’s excellent book, Let
the Nations Be Glad. I highly recommend the book, despite a section where
Piper defends Eternal Conscious Torment.
Ironically, it was while reading this section of Piper’s book that I
began to think that annihilationism might be correct. Piper kindly includes some comments from John
Stott in footnote #15 on page 120. God
has blessed John Piper with a brilliant mind and a gift to passionately and rationally
explain God’s truth. Yet, as I read this
section, Piper’s arguments supporting ECT felt so weak and did not seem to have
Biblical support. Stott’s short comments
in the footnote made sense to me. I
began to think that annihilationism might be true. It was quite a few year later, however, until
I studied this topic in more depth and become convinced of annihilationism and
began to teach it. I hope some of you
reading this will likewise be motivated to study this topic in more depth. I certainly don’t expect this one short post
to convince you.
Resources for More Study
I’ve provided some
links in the text above. In general, the
Rethinking
Hell website has a lot of excellent resources on the nature of Hell. In my
opinion, this website is the single best source of information on Conditional
Immortality/Annihilationism. You will
find a massive amount of resources there.
I preached a two
part sermon introducing the topic of annihilationism. The sermons are on YouTube here and here.
On my own blog, in
addition to the links provided above, I recently wrote this relevant post:
May God continue to bless the ministry of John Piper. This issue (ECT vs. Annihilationism) should
never divide Christians. We agree that a terrible fate awaits the unrighteous
and that seeing them saved from this fate is one of the motivations we have to
take risks and make sacrifices to share God’s Good News and spread His love in
Jesus’ Name all over the world.
//“Eternal judgment” does not refer to a process of judging which goes on forever. It refers to a judgment with eternal, permanent consequences. In the same way “eternal punishment” does not refer to a process of punishing which goes on forever. It refers to a punishment with eternal, permanent consequences.//
ReplyDeleteWhat evidence do you have for your interpretation of eternal judgment and eternal punishment, other than it fits your conditional immortality view? Why can't it mean an ongoing judgment or punishment?
As far as "eternal judgment" goes, one of the reasons to believe that it refers to a judgment which takes a limited time to carry out, but which has permanent results, is that the Bible speaks of "the day of judgment" (Matthew 10:15; 11:22,24; 12:36; 2 Peter 2:9; 2 Peter 3:7; 1 John 4:17). While "day" may be used figuratively for a period of time longer than 24 hours, it most likely refers to a limited time of judgment. Referring to a process of judgment which went on forever as the "day of judgment" would be very weird.
ReplyDeleteOnce we accept that "eternal judgment" is not a judgment which takes forever to carry out, but rather a judgment with permanent, eternal, consequences, we can see how "eternal punishment" could be similar.
Since in Matthew 25:46 it is ONLY the righteous who are given eternal life, we should ask ourselves what type of punishment does not require living forever, but does have an eternal, permanent element to it. The answer is permanent, irreversible death.
I might add that even if the judgment doesn’t take place in one literal day, the fundamental aspect of it is to pass judgment on people. God examines those whose names are written in the book of life or not. It may take some time, but it certainly won’t take thousands of years much less eternity.
DeleteAdditionally, even if it’s not a literal 24 hour day, the process of determining whose names are written in the book of life should not take thousands of years much less eternity.
DeleteI totally support Mark's conclusions on this matter. It is biblical. The problem with the traditional understanding of hell is that it is so entrenched that people try to defend it and in doing so have to twist scripture to bend to that position when it clearly doesn't. As Christians we have no obligation to the traditions of the past, if so we would have to reject the reformation as heresy. Instead, we owe it to our God to truthfully and accurately represent him in all his facets, as a Savior and as a Judge. God bless you Mark.
ReplyDelete